7th Cavalry Gaming

Join the Tactical Gaming Excellence

AAR DCS | DCS August Armageddon | Operation Tiger Eye II

After Action Report
Status
Not open for further replies.

Gallagher.P

Warrant Officer 1
Active Duty
2/A/ACD SL/ASL
S7 Staff
S3 Staff
Local time
4:33 PM
Messages
217
Reaction score
165
Campaign of Combat Mission: DCS August Armageddon
Name of Combat Mission: Operation Tiger Eye II
Number Within Campaign: 1/
Game: DCS
Server: Operation Server
Date of Combat Mission: 08AUG2026
Time of Combat Mission (Zulu): 0000z

OIC/Mission Controller: Specialist Gallagher.P

Total - 30

Attendees
First Sergeant Dibdin.H
First Sergeant Raptor.T
First Lieutenant Huber.B
Second Lieutenant Harvey.D
Warrant Officer 1 Baruch.J
Warrant Officer 1 Brown.L
Warrant Officer 1 Carson.J
Warrant Officer 1 Folmer.R
Warrant Officer 1 Robinson.S
Warrant Officer 1 Tech.E
Warrant Officer 1 Thomas.D
Warrant Officer 1 Villmarsson.L
Corporal Forrest.D
Specialist Gallagher.P
Specialist Grant.J
Specialist Hagler.M
Specialist Mazovian.P
Specialist Monzon.E
Specialist Moreno.J
Specialist Singh.S
Private First Class Brosseau.A
Private First Class Gallistel.L
Private Allen.JD
Private Arizona.F
Private Kajaus.A

Reservist Schmidt.B
Reservist Astro.M

Guests
Achiles 1-2 "Vulture"
Lex "Babyface" Sleepwell
Nuggett

AAR

Pros
  • Mission was well designed and laid out.
  • Waypoints and flight planning worked well.
  • Good use of real-world imagery in the briefing added to immersion.
  • Mission audio was a nice addition.
  • Good pacing; flights stayed busy and had plenty to engage.
  • Strong overall execution of assigned objectives.
  • Good coordination and timing between different aircraft, particularly with the C-130.
  • CAP was generally effective, with good flying from the F-14s and Hornets.
  • Strong inter-flight communications and teamwork.
  • Good crew coordination between pilots and RIOs.
  • Flights generally stayed cohesive.
  • Target-rich environment kept the mission engaging.
  • MIST and artillery integration worked well and provided useful training opportunities.
  • Mission complexity was appropriate and generally well received.
  • Several first-time participants had a good experience, including first-time flight leadership.

Cons
  • Red air became excessive toward the end of the mission.
  • Red air was occasionally able to penetrate the CAP line.
  • Commit ranges need work; Fox-3s were sometimes employed far too close.
  • Racetrack patterns need to be used more consistently.
  • Hornets need better target sorting and allocation.
  • Excessive AIM-120 expenditure against individual targets.
  • Tanker usage needs improvement.
  • One flight went to the wrong tanker.
  • Tanker speed contributed to unnecessary fuel consumption.
  • Aircraft were lost or threatened around the tanker.
  • Some aircraft may have been operating too close to friendly rotary-wing traffic.
  • Communications plan was missing from the kneeboard.
  • Fuel management could be improved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rutkowski.P

Sergeant
Active Duty
1/C/1-7 SL/ASL
DEVCOM
RRD Lead/Senior
S1 Lead/Senior
S1 Staff
S2 Staff
Local time
10:33 PM
Messages
4,607
Reaction score
1,267
S1 Locked.
 

Rutkowski.P

Sergeant
Active Duty
1/C/1-7 SL/ASL
DEVCOM
RRD Lead/Senior
S1 Lead/Senior
S1 Staff
S2 Staff
Local time
10:33 PM
Messages
4,607
Reaction score
1,267
S1 Operations Processed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top